Policy on AI Usage
JAFR’s Policy on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Publication Process
JAFR recognises the growing role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) tools and technologies in academic research, writing, and publication. While such technologies may enhance efficiency and support authors and reviewers, JAFR emphasises that academic integrity, accuracy, and accountability remain paramount. The following principles and guidelines set out the acceptable and unacceptable uses of AI in connection with submissions to JAFR journal.
- Accountability and Integrity
Authors and peer reviewers are fully responsible for the accuracy, originality, and ethical integrity of the work they submit or review. This responsibility cannot be delegated to, or replaced by, AI tools. Any errors, misrepresentations, or ethical breaches—whether or not facilitated by AI remain the sole responsibility of the human contributors. - Responsible and Transparent Use
The use of AI tools must be conducted in a responsible, ethical, and transparent manner. Authors should be prepared to disclose the nature and extent of AI usage in their work, if requested, and ensure that the use of AI does not infringe on copyright, privacy, or other legal or ethical standards. - Supplementary Role of AI
AI technologies must not replace human judgement or intellectual contribution. They may be used to support and enhance the publication process but cannot substitute for the creative, critical, and analytical input of the author or peer reviewer. - Prohibited Uses of Generative AI
It is strictly prohibited to use generative AI tools or technologies to create, draft, or write new material that forms any part of a submission. This includes, but is not limited to, producing original text, generating research content, or constructing arguments on behalf of the author. Such activities undermine the authenticity of scholarly work and risk compromising academic standards. - Permitted Uses of Generative AI
Generative AI tools may be used for copy-editing purposes on an author’s own original material. This includes activities such as:
- Correcting spelling, grammar, and punctuation
- Refining sentence structure for improved clarity and readability
- Formatting text in accordance with journal style requirements
- Enhancing the flow and coherence of existing arguments without introducing new ideas or content
When used for copy-editing, the author must ensure that:
- All underlying ideas and arguments remain the author’s own work
- The AI tool’s role is purely mechanical or linguistic in nature
- The final responsibility for verifying accuracy and meaning lies with the author
- Compliance with Overarching Principles
All AI-assisted activities must comply with JAFR’s overarching principles of accountability, transparency, and the supplementary (rather than replacement) role of AI in scholarly publishing.
By following these guidelines, JAFR seeks to balance the potential benefits of AI in improving clarity and efficiency with the need to protect the integrity, originality, and human-centred nature of academic research and publishing.
